Engineering in the Art

Magic in the Design and Engineering in the Art – Part 2

Engineering in the Art:

Part 2

 

We are so commonly taught that so many fields don’t cross with others.  Especially when it concerns a creative fields, why on earth would creative types and artists have anything to offer other fields.  And for that matter what do other fields have to offer creative and art fields.   The truth, as I see it, is that we all have something to offer regardless of field and profession.  We think in different ways and our brain see and process in different patterns.  And that is the heart of this particular post…

So often we get caught up in what something looks like and forget that what we create or design also must be produced in full to life scale and more often than not interacted with by humans.  There are so many design specializations these days and just as many structure, engineering and other areas.  The thing is that most of these area have limited interaction with one another.  Often forget that these more “technical” fields also often are manned by those who have a creative thought process.  These individuals are invaluable contributors to the creative process and especially the execution of the product. 

Technical Directors, Automation Engineers, Structural Engineers, Electrical Engineers, Computer Programmers, Coders, and many other more specialized that I have not listed; are typically classified as “non-creative”.  What I have found through experience and observation is that these areas are in fact quite creative but just not in the sense of the typical aesthetic that we think of as art.   By and large these people are just as creative as the typical creative as they must problem solve and “create” or reverse engineer what we, the typical “creative”, dream up.  And truly that is just as strenuous and an outside of the box development process as the design process. 

Looking at the term “reverse engineering” I find it fascinating as it implies that what they are undertaking requires a base knowledge and theory, like ours, that is specialized but that it requires creation of new solutions that have not been used before to achieve creative works.  They have great skill to understand and work through this based on what they and others have done to create custom solutions.  The key here is that they create, and that is why I call engineering an art form.  The knowledge base is vast, but they are visionaries and problems solvers just as we, as designers are. 

Without these partners on our creative teams we cannot dream of achieving the best versions of the visions that we dream up.  We cannot claim to hold all the knowledge that we need to create it all on our own and we are not experts in everything.  Most designers I know do not wish to be experts in it “all” and want to stick to the artistic side of the vision.  Though sometimes we do get wrapped up in “our” vision and can take for granted others who are our partners, we can be a bit single minded at times.  These partners and counter parts are valuable and worthy of much respect, as many this makes the seemingly impossible ideas achievable. 

edited.jpg

On the flip side it is equally valuable to understand that all creatives approach to design and industry are different; there are those who hold more technical and engineering knowledge that others.  There are still factions in our industries that believe that designers in general should have little to no technical knowledge as though it might hamper the creative process.  That is one school of thought, but I believe that if it works for your process and practice as a designer then there is nothing wrong with it.  Also, that is should not hold you back from being a creative powerhouse but that is should only make you stronger.

Art and creativity come in many guises and many of the scientific and engineering breakthroughs would not have occurred if creative people had not thought in non-traditional ways to come up with new methods and solutions. 

Do not think inside a box, or even outside of the box.  Create the box, create many new boxes.

Magic in the Design and Engineering in the Art – Part 1



I hope that all are rested and rejuvenated after the holidays, though often for those of us in these industries it is a very busy time of year.  In any case much appreciated the continuation of your eyes on my rantings.

I started this as one long post and realized that it should actually be two as it seemed as I worked through my thoughts that they were two related but distinct topics.

edited.jpg

———

“ What the eyes see and the ears hear, the mind believes.”

-Harry Houdini

Magic-

Abracadabra………………alacazam………………………..POOF!!!!! And there lies everything in a production, film or experience except for the performers.  Ok, so maybe that is a bit of an exaggeration but as far as the audience is concerned that seems to be how so much happens behind the curtain, so to speak.

Designers and creatives are taught for the most part that our art and creation are an integral part of any production.  Yet it often seems that our work is to be seen but never to stand on the merit of effort of ourselves and the many others that it takes to produce it.  So, it often feels that we act as magicians where what we create and produce are the coveted secrets and only the product is the viewable to the audience and client.  As a result much is not understood in regard to what it takes to design, engineer and produce the works. And to some situations this is very detrimental to the over all value for us, our clients, audience and profession both fiscally and creatively. 

We as designers spend weeks, months and in some cases years working to create purposeful design and effects to help tell a story and create an environment. This is not to cause controversy in the way in which we work within these industries but in hopes of starting a larger conversation within ourselves to start placing a higher value on our own work.  We owe it to ourselves to understand that what we produce is art and should be treated and valued as such from the beginning. 

 Design is not just something that is in the background but that is a partner in the tale or the brand.  This is not a wish to have design or effects take place or prominence over the performers but to reset the balance and understanding of it as an equal partner.  Nor it is meant to take the true “magic” out of a production but to help ourselves, our audience and clients know that there is so much more value in what we do than what is recognized in most of our industries. 

It is some wish that there be understand of those who produce our creative visions as part of the great vision and worthy of value as well.  For without the technicians, stitchers, artisans and crafts people the creative vision will not be achieved.  It has been too long in our industries where we have placed so little value on these individuals who create our “magic”.  But this seems to be a potential topic for a later post.

Magic has a place but what we do is use a visual language to tell a story that both enhances the performers or speaker but that is an equal partner in representing and enacting that story.

Introduction: What is Design Mind?

Structure and foundation can be just a beautiful as the finished product. KMK Design image.

Structure and foundation can be just a beautiful as the finished product. KMK Design image.

So design in the contemporary creative market and world can mean so many different things. As many of you know I find design, art, design theory, and creative practice to have so much more value that just the accepted norm (whatever that might be). In other words this will become a place to discuss design, design thinking, in depth application of design into many different industries, design education and how it has changed and how it needs to continue to change. Also another point will be the broader value of Entertainment Designers and how underrated we are in a broader industries simply because no one understands what we do. Even if what we do is similar to everyone other design field.

My goal with this is to have a place for thoughts and ideas, I may eventually open this up to guest authors and comments, but I have to see where this might go. There are so many paths and topics and I am really fascinated to be creating this as an avenue of expression and discussion.

As many of you who know me through social media I love to share interesting, unique, inspirational and even captivating images of art, architecture, technology and even design theory. At times I am even impassioned when I find a crossover discussion or article relating the parallels between the creative process or an artist/designer and how important that “creative mind” can be in non-traditional applications and fields.

I can’t promise that this will be the most organized idea I have had ever had, but I have been thinking about doing something like this for a while. So here goes.

I came up with the idea for “Design Mind” as a starting point because so often I find creative fields are not understood and the “industries” are changing so quickly. I wanted there to be a platform to discuss traditional methodologies and advanced ground breaking technologies. To that point even to follow flight of fancy into theoretical used of creative fields.

Also there are so many companies, materials and uses of traditional and non-traditional elements these day, I just want to chat about them. I suppose its a way to create a round table discussion of the contemporary design and production world.

Lets give it a whirl, shall we.